Comparison

Cloudflare Tunnel vs 41tunnels for local LLMs

Cloudflare Tunnel is most people's first answer to "how do I reach my machine from outside the LAN." It's free, mature, and not tied to any one use case. If you already run it for other services, you don't need to switch.

It also wasn't built for this. Getting an OpenAI-compatible endpoint in front of Ollama through cloudflared means standing up a tunnel, a hostname, and usually a small reverse proxy in front of Ollama's own API. None of it is hard; all of it is extra steps a purpose-built tool skips.

Here's an honest comparison, not a sales pitch: Cloudflare wins outright on one of these.

Cloudflare Tunnel41tunnels
Setup complexityOne command, general-purposeInstall Amallo, done, but it only does this one job
End-to-end encryptionTerminated at Cloudflare's edgeOptional, via Amallo's paired connection mode
OpenAI-API compatible out of the boxYou wire up the reverse proxy yourselfThe whole point of Relay
Self-hosting the tunnel serverCloudflare's network onlyRelay is open source, run your own
Account requiredCloudflare accountNone

If you're already tunnelling other services through Cloudflare, or you want CDN and edge features beyond just Ollama, keep using it. It's battle-tested at a scale 41tunnels doesn't try to match. If the only thing you're exposing is your own models, a purpose-built endpoint is less to wire up:

# same client, no reverse proxy to write
base_url = https://relay.41tunnels.com/v1
api_key  = 41t_9f2c…
model    = llama3.1:8b

Either way, the model stays on your own hardware; the only question is how much plumbing you want to own to reach it.